Skip to main content
Legal Aid Board Sierra Leone
Summary of the Legal Aid Guide
Introduction
The Legal Aid Board is governed by the Legal Aid Act No 42 of 2012 and conducts its affairs according to the Legal Aid Guide and the Rules and Regulations made pursuant to both the Act and the Guide. A legal aid lawyer must advise a prospective client at the earliest opportunity on the following: 1.The availability of legal aid services; and 2. the qualification or non-qualification of the client to obtain legal aid.
It is therefore the duty of all legal aid practitioners and cooperation partners to have a copy of the Legal Aid Act and the Legal Aid Guide.

Legal aid provision
Legal aid services are not available to persons who can afford to pay for the services of a legal practitioner. Legal aid is available only to persons who are indigents and who satisfy the ‘Means Test’ and in the interest of justice.

Residence of applicant and seat of court
LAB grants legal aid primarily in criminal matters to indigent persons who qualify for legal aid under the Legal Aid Guide and who are resident in Sierra Leone. No legal aid will be provided for litigation in any foreign court.

Qualification for legal aid
         For an applicant to qualify for legal aid he must be a Sierra Leonean resident.
         If the applicant is unemployed and has no income or assets, or his income and assets are below the level stipulated by the LAB as qualification for indigency, he automatically qualifies for legal aid.
         If the applicant is employed, his age (whether below 18 years) and marital status are considered, and then whether or not he can afford the services of a lawyer is determined (The Means Test).  
         If it is ‘in the interest of justice’ that the applicant is legally represented, but he does not pass the means test, it must be assessed whether, despite failing the means test, he will be able to afford the cost of legal representation. This assessment will involve an investigation into the complexity and duration of the trial.
Emergency legal aid
The Board also provides emergency legal aid to indigents where the circumstances so require.
Asylum seekers
Legal aid is available to qualified asylum seekers applying or who intend to apply for asylum in Sierra Leone and resident in Sierra Leone.
Limitation of legal aid in criminal cases
Legal aid is provided in criminal cases where it is the ‘interest of justice’ to do so. However, legal aid will not be provided to perpetual and habitual offenders.

Limitation of legal aid in civil cases
Subject to the ‘interest of justice’, legal representation is not granted in the following cases:
(a) Insolvency cases;
(b) Personal damages cases involving defamation, breach of an engagement contract, infringement of privacy, seduction, adultery or inducing someone to desert or stay away from his or her spouse;
(c) Where there is no substantial and identifiable material benefit to the client;
(d) Cases excluded on good cause shown by the LAB from time to time;
(e) Drafting of Conveyances, leases and tenancy agreements
(f)  Notarization of documents
(g) Matters referred to arbitration
Termination of legal aid
1. A legal aid recipient may cause legal representation to terminate by doing any of the following:
(a) Ceasing to qualify under the means test.
(b) Failing to appear in court without reasonable excuse
(c) Appearing in court late for more than two (2) court sittings
(d) Unreasonably refusing to accept a settlement
(e) Not complying with a contribution order within the stated period agreed with the recipient or, if not stated, within a reasonable time
(f) Terminating the mandate of the legal practitioner or making it impossible for him to carry out his mandate;
(g) Being a perpetual and habitual offender.
2. Where legal representation is terminated by the recipient, the issue of whether to instruct another legal practitioner would be considered and decided by the Director looking at the facts of each case.
3. A legal practitioner may also withdraw or have their mandate terminated as a result of the following:
(a) Conflict of interest;
(b) Ceasing to be in practice;
(c) Ceasing to be an accredited legal aid practitioner;
(d) ill-health or other cause that makes it impossible to carry out their obligations as a practitioner; or
(e) Incompetence or inaction, or failure to submit reports in a timely manner.

Monitoring of legal aid providers
Pursuant to Section 32(1) 32 (1) of the Legal Aid the Board monitors and evaluates the quality of legal aid services provided by legal aid practitioners.

Costs and settlements in civil cases
The Board does not pay or contribute towards costs awarded against legal aid recipients and such recipients are informed beforehand about the possibility of a costs order.

Where, with the consent of the client, a legal aid practitioner negotiates settlement after proceedings have commenced in a civil case, such settlement must provide for the payment of the Board’s costs, unless the Board agrees to waive its claim for costs.

Confidentiality 
All LAB clients’ information are confidential and may only be disclosed to a third party where:
(a)   The client consents to do so; (b) A court orders disclosure; or (c) Pursuant to a statue.

Conclusion
The Legal Aid Guide is the product of the Legal Aid Act. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Legal Aid partners adopt Bye-Laws for Citizens Advisory Bureau

Members of the Citizens Advisory Bureau Working Committee have adopted the Bye-Laws for the soon-to-established Citizens Advisory Bureau (CAB) at a meeting at the AFRICELL Office on Bathurst Street in Freetown on Tuesday. The Committee was put together at a stakeholders’ workshop on June 9 at the Atlantic Hall of the National Stadium Hostels to educate and discuss ideas about the Bureau which will offer Alternative Dispute Resolution, Mediation and Referral services in the community.  The meeting was convened under the auspices of the Sierra Leone Legal Aid Board. It attracted twelve Tribal Headmen from the Western Area, Councilors from the Western Area Urban and Rural District Councils and representatives of the Sierra Leone Police, the Sierra Leone Correctional Service, National Youth Commission and civil society groups. The Consultant for the meeting, Madam Memunata Pratt from the Department of Peace and Conflict Studies, Fourah Bay College led the discussions on the d

Introduction to the Sierra Leone Legal Aid Board

Sierra Leone Legal Aid Board  Introduction Access to a well-funded legal aid scheme is key to the attainment of justice for the poor, marginalized and disadvantaged, though in some circumstances other categories of highly placed persons or professional may require it. Globally many countries around the world have invested in programs and interventions on providing free legal aid services to its citizens. The UN member states have thus accepted that legal aid schemes must not only be optional but should be a key component of national legal justice systems. The UN Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice in Vienna adopted a resolution on "access to legal aid in criminal justice systems". The resolution adopts a set of "Principles and Guidelines" designed to ensure that access to legal information, advice and assistance is available to all through the provision of legal aid—thus realizing rights for the poor and marginalized and entrenching one

Legal Aid secures the discharge of Port Loko child

Legal Aid secures the discharge of Port Loko child The Sierra Leone Legal Aid Board has secured the discharge of a fourteen (14) year school boy from Port Loko. The boy was arrested on 10 August 2016 for house breaking. He was kept in police cell for twenty days before the matter was charged to court. He spent time on remand at the Prison in Port Loko before the Magistrate transferred his case to the juvenile court in Freetown on September 3. Whilst in Freetown, he was remanded at the Dems Juvenile Home in Kingtom. Lawyer for the Legal Aid Board, Joel Deen-Tarawally represented him in Court. He made an application for the matter to be discharged for want of prosecution pursuant to Section 94 of the Criminal Procedure Act of 1965. He told the court that the complainant had appeared in court once despite several adjournments. He argued that it is unfair to continue to keep the offender in detention in a matter the complainant has not taken seriously. The applica